Page 2 of 2
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 7:53 am
by lovely//assassin_
bobnugget wrote:lovely//assassin_ wrote:erm.
what?
i dunno.. of course it's not really my place to say at all, and i guess i always come off as being c u nty but it looks sort of amateurish to me...
it could be because this is what i do for a living though. sorry if i sound mean or whatever...
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:36 am
by Jawa242
Randy and I gave the green light to make the Tribute a 2 disc set... we are re-negotiating pricing and the logistics of it, but for everyone who was pulling for a 2 disc set, we buckled and you got it, lol
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:50 pm
by bobnugget
lovely//assassin_ wrote:
but it looks sort of amateurish to me...
it could be because this is what i do for a living though. sorry if i sound mean or whatever...
amateurish? haha ya i could do better if i spend all day on it but i AM only 16. + in my spare time. later on this year i need to take advanced photography and different graphics classes. i mean this is the first time i have done something as big as this. most the stuff i put up though i do quick. to see who likes what idea best. but cant complain about free.
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 12:54 pm
by lovely//assassin_
didn't you say this is the final version?
i dunno.. it just seems to me that if it's this 'big', then if you know you can do better you probably should.
anyways.
peanutbutter.
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:03 pm
by bobnugget
lovely//assassin_ wrote:didn't you say this is the final version?
i dunno.. it just seems to me that if it's this 'big', then if you know you can do better you probably should.
anyways.
peanutbutter.
final NO!! lol. maybe the way the back looks and the front but not the inside. i only have so much time in a day. and im trying not to "finish" it until i get all the details i need. and i would like it if other people tried to help more often. ie when i asked for pics of David or Jeff i never got any.
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:10 pm
by lovely//assassin_
right, but i thought you had said somewhere that the basic design was set... my bad i guess...
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:11 pm
by bobnugget
do you really hate it THAT bad?
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:33 pm
by lovely//assassin_
i don't hate it! i'm just probably picky and can spot stuff
sorry!!! don't take just my word for it, just offering my opinion and all that jazz
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:37 pm
by bobnugget
i like constructive criticism and pointing things out that i may have messed up on but saying its amateurish don't really help much
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:43 pm
by lovely//assassin_
haha, understood.
when i get home from work i'll take a closer look at it.. i get confused with all the different versions of stuff floating around...
Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:53 pm
by bobnugget
ya im going to delete all the old stuff from the net so no one gets confused. i know i posted WAY to much
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:28 am
by Vertigo
My take, as a graphic artist, is that it needs a rework. The text copy on the art just doesn't work for the track listing. It's hard to read. Perhaps a watermark of the art, or a thick stroke on the text? One or the other needs to stand out.
I am not trying to be a dick, just trying to be constructive. I'll gladly work on this with you if you'd so like.
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2007 1:34 pm
by bobnugget
Vertigo wrote:My take, as a graphic artist, is that it needs a rework. The text copy on the art just doesn't work for the track listing. It's hard to read. Perhaps a watermark of the art, or a thick stroke on the text? One or the other needs to stand out.
I am not trying to be a dick, just trying to be constructive. I'll gladly work on this with you if you'd so like.
i didnt put to much work into it until the final list comes out on the 16th
i been working on school stuff lately.
but if you still dont like it when i redo it then sure.